P.S. A Column On Things

By PAUL E. SCHINDLER JR. I am from Portland, Oregon, Beaumont ’66, Benson High ’70, MIT ’74. Some things are impossible to know, but it is impossible to know these things.

SAVE Supporters Keep Real Agenda Secret: The Part They Don’t Say Out Loud

As I say, voter fraud is not an issue. The real agenda: get poor and minority people off voter rolls. No more voice for the woke riff raff. “Those people” will just vote against tax cuts.

It is unimaginable to the Stompers that anyone lives in a  world where they’re not sure how to find or pay for the necessary documents. They can’t just hop into their private jet and fly to their hometown. And here’s the part pro-SAVE bros won’t say: Next stop women. I know that’s true because they are, like their godlike heroes, the Supreme Court supermajority, are originalists. When they can, they will take the franchise from women, maybe even Catholics and Muslims. Several members of the supermajority are Catholic, but who needs the right to vote when you control the levers of power?

Even a constitutional scholar with the fire power of Clarence Thomas knows that the founding fathers only wanted to give the franchise to rich white protestant  property-owning men. Specifically protestant men from northern Europe. Italians? Central or eastern Europeans? Don’t make me laugh.

Catholics? I’m sure the current faithful on the Supreme Court don’t know or don’t care that only one of the 56 signers of the Declaration and two of the 39 signers of the Constitution were Catholic. That’s anti-woke enough to satisfy even Pete “It’s 5 o’clock Somewhere” Hegseth. That’s an originalist fact that may want to ignore.

The part supporters of SAVE don’t say out loud: Women’s suffrage? The 19th amendment? Damn them to hell. Tradwives be praised! We overturned prohibition, we can overturn female suffrage.

The Gang of Six on the Supreme Court will be with them all the way. Any Court willing to overturn Roe V Wade cares  nothing for precedent. Next up: let’s overturn Plessy V Ferguson  and Brown v Board of Education. As Alito will put it: they were decided wrongly. The majority opinions will be written by Clarence Thomas with no respect whatsoever for precedent that violates the whackaddodle legal tenets of the supermajority’s legal faith.


Author's image

Paul E. Schindler Jr.

SEARCH PSACOT 2015-Present

Sign Up For Weekly Email Notification

* indicates required

Email Me

Email Me